Showing posts with label Oral History. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Oral History. Show all posts

Week 15.1: Revision Day


In class today, you will be afforded the time to revise your papers in light of the peer review feedback you received last session and to conference with me on how to improve your work. Coming prepared to class is not only the best way to maximize your use of this time, it is also the best way to do thoroughly better on your final paper.

In order to come prepared for class, please bring a hard and digital copy of your paper.

Week 14.2: Peer Review

 
In class today, you will be afforded the time to give and receive feedback from your peers and conference with me on how to improve your work. Coming prepared to class is not only the best way to maximize your use of this time, it is also the best way to do thoroughly better on your final paper.

In order to come prepared for class, please bring a completed version of your essay that meets all the demands of the assignment, especially page length. It is always much harder to revise a paper when you haven't finished writing it.

Preparation: 
Bring x2 copies of your oral history. Your draft should meet all the demands of the assignment.

Week 11.2: Invisible Hands (Electronics)


Reading:
Invisible Hands, 289-294, 315-338, 366-370
INTERVIEW PROPOSAL DUE

Study Questions:
1. Do a quick Internet search for the phrase "invisible hand." What does this phrase mean? Where does it come from? Why has this book been called Invisible Hands? What is the point the editors are trying to get across?

2. What did you learn from today's reading? How are you personally implicated by what you've read? What does this mean for you?

Week 11.1: Invisible Hands (Resource Extraction)

Harold C. Harvey, St. Just Tin Miners (1935)



Reading:
Invisible Hands, 191-196
Either Albert Mwanaumo or Clive Porabou interview
Viewing: Harold C. Harvey, St. Just Tin Miners (website)

Study Questions:
1. Consider the shape of the oral histories that you've read so far. How do they all begin? How do they progress? Where have they tended to end? How might you use this in shaping your own oral history?


2. What strikes you as the most interesting/significant aspect of the oral history that you read today? What do you believe you should take away from the oral history? What do your peers need to know about the oral history you read?

Week 10.2: Invisible Hands (Agriculture)

Jules Breton, Calling in the Gleaners (1859)
Reading:
Invisible Hands, 107-112
Acuna-Arias (Akolkar Interview)
Cortez-Hardy (Opa Interview)
Hendriksz-MacCarillo (Cocon Interview)
Myers-Sage (Guzman)
Sedighi-Zapeda (Cuello)
Viewing: Jules Breton, Calling in the Gleaners (website)

Study Questions:
1. What connections can you make between the reading you did for today and the reading that you did for last session on "The Garment Industry"? What seems similar between the two narratives? What seems unique?

2. Read over the oral history very carefully. Select the largest section of the narrative and try to imagine what questions the interviewer asked to get the subject to talk? How do you imagine these questions were phrased? What questions would you ask? 

 Review:

Week 5.1: Studs Terkel, Working

J. Howard Miller, We Can Do It (1943)
Studs Terkel's multifaceted life produced an equally rich and varied legacy of research materials. After graduating from University of Chicago's Law School in 1934, Terkel pursued acting and appeared on stage, in radio, and in the movies. He was a playwright, a radio news commentator, a sportscaster, and a film narrator, and worked as a jazz columnist, a disc jockey, and a music festival host. He even served briefly as a civil service employee but is best known as a radio network personality and as a Pulitzer Prize-winning author of books. His award winning books are based on his extensive conversations with Americans from all walks of life that chronicle the profound and often tumultuous changes in our nation during the twentieth century. On "The Studs Terkel Program," which was heard on Chicago's fine arts radio station WFMT from 1952 to 1997, Terkel interviewed Chicagoans and national and international figures who helped shape the past century. The program included guests who were politicians, writers, activists, labor organizers, performing artists, and architects among others. Terkel was remarkable in the depth of his personal knowledge of the diverse subjects explored on his program and his ability to get others to talk about themselves and what they do best. (from Studs Terkel: Conversations with America)

Reading:
Studs Terkel, Working:People Talk About What They Do All Day and How They Feel About What They Do (excerpts) PDF
Today's Reading is in Our Class Packet

Study Questions:
1. What similarities do you see between the first two paragraphs of Terkel's introduction and the theorists whom we have read in the first five weeks of the class?

2. Working is an oral history, meaning that rather than compose a narrative account of what happened, it records the thoughts and expressions of individual people on a particular topic. What are the advantages of this form of history over those forms of history you are probably more accustomed to reading in either high school or college history courses? What strengths does it have when compared to the philosophy that we've read?

3. All of the excerpts we are reading from Working come from Terkel's women correspondents. What commonalities can you find in these oral histories that might relate to the speakers' genders?